Monday, December 31, 2012
Sunday, December 30, 2012
"Have we fallen over the Fiscal Cliff yet?"
From the relative safety of the sidelines, I'm watching the game, enjoying my munchies, and not making any bets. Good old Anonymous put it this way: 'A politician can appear to have his nose to the grindstone while straddling a fence and keeping both ears to the ground.'
Why haven't they reached a compromise yet? Because: too many of them spell the word 'compromise' as 's-u-r-r-e-n-d-e-r', and this is a confrontational system in which too many of them would rather die than surrender. Trouble is, it's their own survival and future well-being they're so willing to die rather than surrender to, and they're quite determined to go down with guns blazing, intractable to the bitter end.
As long as I'm leaning heavily on 'Quotations With An Attitude', here's one from George Burns: 'Too bad the only people who know how to run the country are busy driving cabs and cutting hair.' And Gallagher, the guy who liked to smash watermelons on stage with a big wooden mallet, once said: 'You couldn't get the Ten Commandments through Congress if Moses was buying the drinks!' Right on.
Here's a novel idea: why don't they just go ahead and fall over that fiscal cliff, and then learn how to live within their means, instead of going around saying things like: 'Our credit's good - everybody's got it!' Warren Buffett, the third-richest man alive, says that America will survive, because its womenfolk will rise to the occasion and save its ass, or words to that effect. The implication being America's wives and mothers have more sense than its menfolk and especially its politicians. He could be right.
Why haven't they reached a compromise yet? Because: too many of them spell the word 'compromise' as 's-u-r-r-e-n-d-e-r', and this is a confrontational system in which too many of them would rather die than surrender. Trouble is, it's their own survival and future well-being they're so willing to die rather than surrender to, and they're quite determined to go down with guns blazing, intractable to the bitter end.
As long as I'm leaning heavily on 'Quotations With An Attitude', here's one from George Burns: 'Too bad the only people who know how to run the country are busy driving cabs and cutting hair.' And Gallagher, the guy who liked to smash watermelons on stage with a big wooden mallet, once said: 'You couldn't get the Ten Commandments through Congress if Moses was buying the drinks!' Right on.
Here's a novel idea: why don't they just go ahead and fall over that fiscal cliff, and then learn how to live within their means, instead of going around saying things like: 'Our credit's good - everybody's got it!' Warren Buffett, the third-richest man alive, says that America will survive, because its womenfolk will rise to the occasion and save its ass, or words to that effect. The implication being America's wives and mothers have more sense than its menfolk and especially its politicians. He could be right.
Saturday, December 29, 2012
More musings from 'Oldest Living Blogger'...
When I first started using that 'handle' or nickname, on a community blogging site here that is now defunct because its sponsoring company changed hands, I got a lot of flak from others in our yappy little group because 'you're not old enough!' Well that was then, and this is now, and I'm certainly feeling 'old enough' these days at 80+.
It's once again the middle of the night, or morning, or whatever you'd like to call it, and I'm once again awake from a combination of impatient waterworks and late-night TV. When I woke up, one of those middle-of-the-night infomercials was going on about some kind of superwhite toothpaste that costs about $40 a tube. Hell, I can remember when $40 was a respectable week's pay. And why can't my bladder or kidneys sleep as long as I'd like to? Who's running this show anyway - me or them? Obviously them.
The good news is we're better than halfway through The Silly Season, during which we celebrate traditions of Christmas that aren't really old enough to properly qualify as real honest-to-God traditions, and include mostly ingredients which have little or no actual connection to any legitimate history of Christ or Christianity, if we get right down to it. So we're basically celebrating some popular folktales or myths with which we're just perpetuating the ancient winter solstice celebrations popularized during the days of ancient Rome with their Saturnalia festival which usually was from December 17 to 23. It celebrated their main agricultural god Saturn as well as the 'birth of the sun' as the solstice once again marked the beginning of the lengthening days. Like the old song says, 'Everything old is new again'.
We're now at the part of the Silly Season where we make and break resolutions, and mentally re-bury the famous and semi-famous dead of the past year, and begin to look forward to falling over the Fiscal Cliff, or being snowed in, or taking some of the profits from Christmas business and quietly sneaking off to some tropical vacation spot, if we're lucky enough to be able to do that. And even though prognostications do not appear favorable at the moment, here's hoping we have a Happy New Year.
It's once again the middle of the night, or morning, or whatever you'd like to call it, and I'm once again awake from a combination of impatient waterworks and late-night TV. When I woke up, one of those middle-of-the-night infomercials was going on about some kind of superwhite toothpaste that costs about $40 a tube. Hell, I can remember when $40 was a respectable week's pay. And why can't my bladder or kidneys sleep as long as I'd like to? Who's running this show anyway - me or them? Obviously them.
The good news is we're better than halfway through The Silly Season, during which we celebrate traditions of Christmas that aren't really old enough to properly qualify as real honest-to-God traditions, and include mostly ingredients which have little or no actual connection to any legitimate history of Christ or Christianity, if we get right down to it. So we're basically celebrating some popular folktales or myths with which we're just perpetuating the ancient winter solstice celebrations popularized during the days of ancient Rome with their Saturnalia festival which usually was from December 17 to 23. It celebrated their main agricultural god Saturn as well as the 'birth of the sun' as the solstice once again marked the beginning of the lengthening days. Like the old song says, 'Everything old is new again'.
We're now at the part of the Silly Season where we make and break resolutions, and mentally re-bury the famous and semi-famous dead of the past year, and begin to look forward to falling over the Fiscal Cliff, or being snowed in, or taking some of the profits from Christmas business and quietly sneaking off to some tropical vacation spot, if we're lucky enough to be able to do that. And even though prognostications do not appear favorable at the moment, here's hoping we have a Happy New Year.
Thursday, December 27, 2012
New version just released
This really works too. Just today, it found and removed two of the 'bad guys' from my Windows 7 after I'd been surfing on an infected website. I should also add that Avast 7 and Microsoft Security Essentials didn't notice them, but this one did. Now you know why I have it. I also have SuperAntiSpyware which is very good at finding adware and spyware. You can find it here.
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
"Yes, Virginia...."
Back in September of 1897, a little eight-year-old girl named Virginia O'Hanlon wrote a letter to The Editor of the New York Sun newspaper, asking if there really was a Santa Claus. An editorial writer there, Francis Pharcellus Church, promptly wrote back to her in the form of an editorial in the paper, published on September 21, 1897, and it has become famous all over the world as "Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus". Merry Christmas, Everyone!
Monday, December 24, 2012
Sunday, December 23, 2012
From The Huffington Post, a list.....
Guns keep on killing Americans, as this article tells us.
With roughly one gun per person throughout the country, is it any wonder?
The NRA would tell you that guns don't kill people - people kill people. That's just playing with semantics. The fact is, people can't be trusted with guns because not all of us are responsible and trustworthy. Even those who are don't always remain so, and those who aren't shouldn't be allowed the capability of hurting themselves or others around them. It's called 'common sense' and it is apparently the most uncommon thing around these days, especially in the USA, where the Constitution's Second Amendment has been mistaken for the word of Almighty God on the subject.
The Second Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights, which is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. And 1791 was 221 years ago. The French Revolution was in full swing, and had been for two years. Sex had been invented, but it would be another 31 years before anyone could photograph it. And it would be another 44 years before Sam Colt patented his famous revolver and 75 years before Winchester introduced the repeating rifle. See where I'm going with this? It was one hell of a long time ago when that Second Amendment was adopted, and the world of 1791 was a very different place than it is today. Back then, the Pope wasn't even considered infallible. It would be another 79 years before he was considered any better than the rest of us two-faced lyin' bastards. Things were different then. Very different. America has come a long way since then. Isn't it time its gun laws caught up with the rest of it?
With roughly one gun per person throughout the country, is it any wonder?
The NRA would tell you that guns don't kill people - people kill people. That's just playing with semantics. The fact is, people can't be trusted with guns because not all of us are responsible and trustworthy. Even those who are don't always remain so, and those who aren't shouldn't be allowed the capability of hurting themselves or others around them. It's called 'common sense' and it is apparently the most uncommon thing around these days, especially in the USA, where the Constitution's Second Amendment has been mistaken for the word of Almighty God on the subject.
The Second Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights, which is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. And 1791 was 221 years ago. The French Revolution was in full swing, and had been for two years. Sex had been invented, but it would be another 31 years before anyone could photograph it. And it would be another 44 years before Sam Colt patented his famous revolver and 75 years before Winchester introduced the repeating rifle. See where I'm going with this? It was one hell of a long time ago when that Second Amendment was adopted, and the world of 1791 was a very different place than it is today. Back then, the Pope wasn't even considered infallible. It would be another 79 years before he was considered any better than the rest of us two-faced lyin' bastards. Things were different then. Very different. America has come a long way since then. Isn't it time its gun laws caught up with the rest of it?
A very useful program....
I haven't used this particular computer for about ten days, so when I started it up this morning, it obviously needed some updating. And in addition to your Windows Updates, the handiest program to help you with updating and keeping everything up to date is this one from Secunia called Secunia PSI, for 'Personal Software Inspector'. It will scan your computer and tell you if any of your programs need to be updated. If they are all up to date, it shows a window like this one:-
If any need an update, it can help you obtain it and install it. As we know, keeping programs up to date is one way of maintaining good security on your PC and this helps by reminding you if you have any needing an update.
If any need an update, it can help you obtain it and install it. As we know, keeping programs up to date is one way of maintaining good security on your PC and this helps by reminding you if you have any needing an update.
Saturday, December 22, 2012
Media reactions to the NRA
Blaming the media for some of the responsibility for the massacre wasn't the NRA's smartest move, in case they've got one, as they're finding out.
Here's some of the reactions from the press and you've got to admire their restraint.
And perhaps I might be permitted to point out here that in the book of Matthew, in Chapter 26, verse 52, as Jesus was being arrested and one of those with him had taken a sword and cut off the ear of the high priest's servant, Jesus said to him "Return the sword to its place; for all who take swords will die by swords." Logically, the same may be said of those who take up guns. Statistics would seem to bear that out.
Here's some of the reactions from the press and you've got to admire their restraint.
And perhaps I might be permitted to point out here that in the book of Matthew, in Chapter 26, verse 52, as Jesus was being arrested and one of those with him had taken a sword and cut off the ear of the high priest's servant, Jesus said to him "Return the sword to its place; for all who take swords will die by swords." Logically, the same may be said of those who take up guns. Statistics would seem to bear that out.
More musings from 'Oldest Living Blogger'...
It's another middle-of-the-night bathroom safari time again, and now that I'm awake, I thought I might as well check the news, just in case the world ended after all, like those Mayans predicted. It didn't end, and I think I know why, but that's for another rant entirely.
For now, let's talk for a moment or two about this local 'Catholics Come Home' campaign currently in progress around the Archdiocese of Vancouver. It's a very slick and elaborate 'spin-doctoring' campaign with headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia. It wants us non-practicing Catholics to 'come home' because they desperately need our bums in the seats and our collections on the plates. They're telling us we've been staying away because we've simply been "too busy" or we had objections to their rules on abortion or contraception. They very carefully avoid any hint of their past sexual abuse scandals, their priests breaking their vows, or their unrealistic attitudes toward divorce and other disgustingly frequent human failings common to not just us Catholics, but everybody.
They did a survey a while back, and found that they had 96,000 Catholics attending Mass around here, out of a possible 460,000 of us. So about 20% of us go to church. I'm tempted to say "the rest of us know better" but that would be an unnecessarily facetious remark. I'm sure there's a lot of very good and decent and righteous people still attending Mass. I haven't been one of them since my divorce in the 1960s, but that also is a rant for some other time.
Update:
I mentioned sexual abuse scandals, and here's why we have a problem with all of that. We're not convinced that there's been a real clean-up, and not just more smoke and mirrors 'spin-doctoring' instead of real action. It appears we have legitimate concerns.
For now, let's talk for a moment or two about this local 'Catholics Come Home' campaign currently in progress around the Archdiocese of Vancouver. It's a very slick and elaborate 'spin-doctoring' campaign with headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia. It wants us non-practicing Catholics to 'come home' because they desperately need our bums in the seats and our collections on the plates. They're telling us we've been staying away because we've simply been "too busy" or we had objections to their rules on abortion or contraception. They very carefully avoid any hint of their past sexual abuse scandals, their priests breaking their vows, or their unrealistic attitudes toward divorce and other disgustingly frequent human failings common to not just us Catholics, but everybody.
They did a survey a while back, and found that they had 96,000 Catholics attending Mass around here, out of a possible 460,000 of us. So about 20% of us go to church. I'm tempted to say "the rest of us know better" but that would be an unnecessarily facetious remark. I'm sure there's a lot of very good and decent and righteous people still attending Mass. I haven't been one of them since my divorce in the 1960s, but that also is a rant for some other time.
Update:
I mentioned sexual abuse scandals, and here's why we have a problem with all of that. We're not convinced that there's been a real clean-up, and not just more smoke and mirrors 'spin-doctoring' instead of real action. It appears we have legitimate concerns.
Friday, December 21, 2012
Security programs: Some don't like others
And some that did like others don't after becoming 'new & improved' as I found out this morning during the start-up process on this machine. For a long time, I've been using three different programs, consisting of two anti-virus ones and an anti-spyware.
Today, the anti-spyware kept flagging 11 items in a mix from Avast 7 and Windows files, and yet three other security programs scanned the machine and found nothing wrong. So I had to conclude that it was a false alarm. Then when I tried to send an email to the offending program's home base, I'm politely informed that from today until January 2nd, their customer service is closed for the holidays.
I disabled the offending program's real-time protection which was the part causing the problems, and all's well. But without that real-time protection, their professional version isn't any better than their freebie version, and they aren't even going to know there's a problem for another two weeks.
Update: A reply from SuperAntiSpyware on my problem:-
" We greatly apologize for the inconvenience. Due to an issue with a definition release early this morning, SUPERAntiSpyware incorrectly detected and removed certain components of AVAST! software on affected customer PCs. While we are still trying to determine the cause of this error, we can tell you that it is quite easy to remedy the situation on your computer."
I must confess I misjudged the folks at SuperAntiSpyware - they are aware of the problem and how to fix it, and I'm very grateful for the reply from them. No lives were lost, and all's well that ends well. And while I'm on the subject, their program really is good at finding spyware on a computer - even if sometimes, like today, it gets a little too enthusiastic. What it was detecting as spyware and trojans were actually the parts of the Avast downloader and installer executables which were at that time active in trying to update my Avast program with its latest database files, and all that activity was being seen as a series of threats, when in fact it was just the normal events that always occur during the start-up phase of the program's daily use. Normally, these two programs get along together just fine, and this is the first time I've ever had a conflict between them. Both of them are designed to be compatible with many other security programs, and so this was really quite an unusual event.
Today, the anti-spyware kept flagging 11 items in a mix from Avast 7 and Windows files, and yet three other security programs scanned the machine and found nothing wrong. So I had to conclude that it was a false alarm. Then when I tried to send an email to the offending program's home base, I'm politely informed that from today until January 2nd, their customer service is closed for the holidays.
I disabled the offending program's real-time protection which was the part causing the problems, and all's well. But without that real-time protection, their professional version isn't any better than their freebie version, and they aren't even going to know there's a problem for another two weeks.
Update: A reply from SuperAntiSpyware on my problem:-
" We greatly apologize for the inconvenience. Due to an issue with a definition release early this morning, SUPERAntiSpyware incorrectly detected and removed certain components of AVAST! software on affected customer PCs. While we are still trying to determine the cause of this error, we can tell you that it is quite easy to remedy the situation on your computer."
I must confess I misjudged the folks at SuperAntiSpyware - they are aware of the problem and how to fix it, and I'm very grateful for the reply from them. No lives were lost, and all's well that ends well. And while I'm on the subject, their program really is good at finding spyware on a computer - even if sometimes, like today, it gets a little too enthusiastic. What it was detecting as spyware and trojans were actually the parts of the Avast downloader and installer executables which were at that time active in trying to update my Avast program with its latest database files, and all that activity was being seen as a series of threats, when in fact it was just the normal events that always occur during the start-up phase of the program's daily use. Normally, these two programs get along together just fine, and this is the first time I've ever had a conflict between them. Both of them are designed to be compatible with many other security programs, and so this was really quite an unusual event.
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Greetings from my federal government...
I got my annual seasonal greetings from my federal government of Canada today, in the form of next month's pensions payment. This means that the federal money that arrived today has to last me for the next 43 days, during which there are two major holidays and the well-known January sales.
If this is how they express their affection for a life-long citizen and regular taxpayer, then I certainly don't want to find out how they might act if they didn't like me.
If this is how they express their affection for a life-long citizen and regular taxpayer, then I certainly don't want to find out how they might act if they didn't like me.
Thoughts while reading the news...
Surfing Google's News today, this article caught my eye. That picture is becoming an all-too-familiar sight in today's world, and my next thought had to do with what we really and truly believe in - God or guns?
Another search on the web found an article in which it says a Gallup poll recently found that 41% of Americans say they regularly attend religious services. You have to wonder how those folks define a religious service, when another website claims to have checked those figures and found that only about 21% of Americans and 10% of Canadians actually go to church one or more times a week, while many say they have when they have not. This leaves me with the definite impression that about half of those claiming to be religious are in fact merely lying about it because they'd rather not have others know the truth.
And I'm still wondering: what do Americans really place their faith in - their God, or their guns? Based on the observable evidence, it would seem that they pay lip service to their God, but put their money on their guns.
Another search on the web found an article in which it says a Gallup poll recently found that 41% of Americans say they regularly attend religious services. You have to wonder how those folks define a religious service, when another website claims to have checked those figures and found that only about 21% of Americans and 10% of Canadians actually go to church one or more times a week, while many say they have when they have not. This leaves me with the definite impression that about half of those claiming to be religious are in fact merely lying about it because they'd rather not have others know the truth.
And I'm still wondering: what do Americans really place their faith in - their God, or their guns? Based on the observable evidence, it would seem that they pay lip service to their God, but put their money on their guns.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Need a gift idea?
For someone who watches a lot of TV movies, or even for someone who asks, "Who was in that movie?" you just can't beat VideoHound's Golden Movie Retriever. This is a hefty book, with loads of information, written with brevity and wit.
For example, the other night, I was watching an old Billy Crystal epic on the late show called 'Memories of Me' and I wanted to recall the name of one of the actors, so I grabbed VideoHound's book, and looked it up. I not only found what I was looking for, but got a good smile out of their description of that movie:- "...Story of child/parent relationships attempts to pull at the heart-strings but only gets as far as the liver. Co-written and co-produced by Crystal, this film never quite reaches the potential of its cast." This is just one of about 31,000 reviews in the book.
And for those of you who aren't bookish, here's VideoHound on line. I hasten to add here however that the on-line version, while still containing plenty of nearly-current information, hasn't been kept up since June 5th, 2011. The book itself is revised on an annual basis, to include the latest releases, and perhaps the website was competing with the book sales. The book also contains information on directors and others who are associated with these productions, and is a paperback of 1921 pages. The last year's copy also makes one hell of a doorstop, in case you need one.
For example, the other night, I was watching an old Billy Crystal epic on the late show called 'Memories of Me' and I wanted to recall the name of one of the actors, so I grabbed VideoHound's book, and looked it up. I not only found what I was looking for, but got a good smile out of their description of that movie:- "...Story of child/parent relationships attempts to pull at the heart-strings but only gets as far as the liver. Co-written and co-produced by Crystal, this film never quite reaches the potential of its cast." This is just one of about 31,000 reviews in the book.
And for those of you who aren't bookish, here's VideoHound on line. I hasten to add here however that the on-line version, while still containing plenty of nearly-current information, hasn't been kept up since June 5th, 2011. The book itself is revised on an annual basis, to include the latest releases, and perhaps the website was competing with the book sales. The book also contains information on directors and others who are associated with these productions, and is a paperback of 1921 pages. The last year's copy also makes one hell of a doorstop, in case you need one.
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
More pictures...
The sun is breaking through the clouds in places...
And this is also part of West Vancouver's British Properties,
looking very Christmasy indeed.
Monday, December 17, 2012
Sunday, December 16, 2012
After the massacre
An opinion writer in The Washington Post asks us in effect 'How often must this happen?' That's an excellent question, and overdue.
I'm not living in America myself - I'm 35 or 40 miles north of your border in Canada, but let's face it, America - you've got the world's number one military with more firepower than anybody. Here's the website that says so. So today's Question Everything has got to be: "Why do you need gun laws that allow any mentally challenged or disturbed individual easy access to automatic weapons that most of the rest of the civilized world considers restricted weapons the access to which is limited to trained and authorized personnel for specific purposes?"
Who is running America these days - the government or the goddamned NRA? Some of us bystanders in the cheap seats here would really like to know. Does the NRA support the survivors of these massacres, comfort the loved ones, and replace lost incomes, or even apologize for its own stupidity? Of course not! So why are you letting them go on misinterpreting your Constitution's section about the right to bear arms? Remember the context in which that Constitution was written. It was a long time ago, and prior to that, the original colonies were under British jurisdiction and they made the laws, some of which regulated who could run around loose with guns. There were definite restrictions because those Brits were shipping their convicts to your colonies, and they feared an uprising, and justifiably so.
Your Constitution's part about the right to bear arms in its original context was intended to allow ordinary citizens to bear arms for their own defense against a possible attack from outside their own colonies - to repel an invasion in other words, and prevent the British or anyone else from imposing their will on the American people against the wishes of the citizenry. It wasn't meant to allow just any trigger-happy nitwit the right to carry all the weapons he could lift, and blast away at anything that seemed like a likely target. The nation's founders weren't idiots, and neither should you be, no matter what you hear from the NRA or its lobbyists and special interest groups.
I'm not living in America myself - I'm 35 or 40 miles north of your border in Canada, but let's face it, America - you've got the world's number one military with more firepower than anybody. Here's the website that says so. So today's Question Everything has got to be: "Why do you need gun laws that allow any mentally challenged or disturbed individual easy access to automatic weapons that most of the rest of the civilized world considers restricted weapons the access to which is limited to trained and authorized personnel for specific purposes?"
Who is running America these days - the government or the goddamned NRA? Some of us bystanders in the cheap seats here would really like to know. Does the NRA support the survivors of these massacres, comfort the loved ones, and replace lost incomes, or even apologize for its own stupidity? Of course not! So why are you letting them go on misinterpreting your Constitution's section about the right to bear arms? Remember the context in which that Constitution was written. It was a long time ago, and prior to that, the original colonies were under British jurisdiction and they made the laws, some of which regulated who could run around loose with guns. There were definite restrictions because those Brits were shipping their convicts to your colonies, and they feared an uprising, and justifiably so.
Your Constitution's part about the right to bear arms in its original context was intended to allow ordinary citizens to bear arms for their own defense against a possible attack from outside their own colonies - to repel an invasion in other words, and prevent the British or anyone else from imposing their will on the American people against the wishes of the citizenry. It wasn't meant to allow just any trigger-happy nitwit the right to carry all the weapons he could lift, and blast away at anything that seemed like a likely target. The nation's founders weren't idiots, and neither should you be, no matter what you hear from the NRA or its lobbyists and special interest groups.
Season's Greetings
The only thing constant in life is change, as they say. Traditional greeting cards have had their day, and the latest trend is an electronic variety. You can go to a special website where they will send out an animated greeting card on your behalf for a moderate cost. In other words, you hire some total stranger to send a friend their version of what you would like to say to that distant friend. How personal is that?
So I like to make my own. There are a couple of ways you can go - if you have a nice graphics editing program and a pen tablet, or your computer is capable of that job itself, then you can make your own 'by hand' as it were; the other way being as above, wherein I found a nice picture of a peaceful pastoral scene, and added my own caption.
The cheapskate's basic all-purpose generic greeting with minimal personalization, in other words. So, to everyone out there in the nebulous indistinctness of cyberspace, I wish you all the very best of this festive season, whatever you choose to call it.
Friday, December 14, 2012
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Microsoft Support..... or not.
The problem isn't with the graphics card, it is with Windows Updates which keeps trying to offer me updates for the long-gone Nvidia graphics card. So I thought I'd send a little 'heads-up' to Microsoft about it, and I contacted Microsoft Support. After providing my Microsoft I.D. and all that, I finally got onto a page that offers live chat with one of their resident experts. There's only one problem with that: if they actually do something for you, then there's a charge of $99.00 for the service. My Windows 7 Home Premium cost me a little more than that, but not much, and my Windows 8 Pro cost me less than half of that - just over $44 with tax. So if you have problems, it's probably cheaper to throw out the operating system entirely and install a fresh version rather than pay Microsoft to try to fix it. You can re-install Windows in about 45 minutes, and you won't have to play "20 questions" with a Microsoft Tech, or spend another hundred bucks for doing it. ( I didn't buy their help, by the way - I was simply trying to let them know that Windows Updates can use a little more work on its fine tuning.)
And if you get really choked up over your Windows problems, and want to try something entirely different and yet entirely free for the taking, you can always get a copy of PC-BSD 9.0 which looks and acts a lot like a cross between Windows and a Mac, and comes with plenty of also-free add-ons in the form of programs with which to fluff it out and pump it up and make it a real 'giant-killer'..... So I just wanted to mention all this, before you whip out your credit card and make Microsoft considerably richer without sufficient provocation. Because? Because - there's always more than one way to skin a cat.
This is a screenshot of the desktop of PC-BSD 9.0 showing a few of its Widgets - the main ones - which open up all sorts of other possibilities. I'm still learning about most of those, so I can't give you a long story just yet, but I can say that I'm very surprised and impressed by everything that this operating system contains, and the many items that can be added to it. It is a very detailed and carefully planned system, and you ought to take a look at it for yourself. You will, of course, need to create a new partition on your drive to make a place for it, but that's not a big problem. And in case you may be wondering, there is a very nice selection of programs, and more than one of each type, from which to choose when you want a particular application for a specific set of tasks, so there is a variety of things available and you aren't limited to simply one or two or 'take it or leave it'. There's plenty of choices.
It puts its competition in a whole other light, lets say - and if you try it, then you'll see what I mean. This is a very nice operating system.
Here is a different background, and the main portion of it is displaying the many choices available in graphics programs - just to illustrate what I said earlier about having plenty of choices. Very nice!
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Something Google would rather you didn't discover...
No wonder governments are having trouble collecting enough taxes to cover all of their expenditures when multinationals like Google stash their cash in tax havens like Bermuda to avoid paying their full share in various nations where they make fortunes.
And on top of that, Google's 'in your face' promotions of its services are becoming a real pain in the ass, and an insult to our stupidity.
And on top of that, Google's 'in your face' promotions of its services are becoming a real pain in the ass, and an insult to our stupidity.
How much do retailers depend on the holidays?
And the answer is from the National Retail Foundation saying about this much.
The holidays being when they sell us all those non-essential slow-moving items that we can usually live happily without during the rest of the year when sanity prevails and we're more mindful of that 20% interest being charged on our credit card balances, if any.
The holidays being when they sell us all those non-essential slow-moving items that we can usually live happily without during the rest of the year when sanity prevails and we're more mindful of that 20% interest being charged on our credit card balances, if any.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Re-freeze the melting Arctic?
Some days, the more I read about the health or lack thereof of the world's environment, the less faith I have in mankind's long-term future. When we get right down to it, everybody's looking for the easy way out, and there really isn't any. And like it says in this article, trusting the same people who caused the problem with finding a suitable cure seems excessively foolhardy, if not downright stupid.
Monday, December 10, 2012
The Fermi Paradox: "Where are they?"
One day in 1950, the physicist Enrico Fermi asked his colleagues during lunch this now famous question: "Where are they?" meaning where are all the aliens, if there's so many presumably habitable planets probable in the rest of the galaxy. And that lunchtime conversation led to what's now known as the Fermi Paradox.
The world's eggheads have picked it up and ran with it, and made what I have to believe were tongue-in-cheek formulae for 'solving' the problem, even though there's no possible way to verify half the unknowns in their calculations. Maybe this is how the brains of the world amuse themselves, who knows?
But I like impossible problems and unanswerable questions, so sit back and give me a whack at this one. We haven't seen verifiable evidence of aliens from outer space, or E.T.s, or however you'd care to describe them - and for very good reasons. If they're capable of interstellar travel, then they're also smart enough to have already detected our radio and television broadcasts flying outwards into space and in effect forming a large 'bubble' around us. Even though those signals get weaker with increased distance, they would act as an 'early warning' for any approaching alien spacecraft. Once they tuned in and cleared up the signals, and discovered that we've got a collective intelligence not much above an unwashed turnip, and that we'd rather fight than eat, and that we're too busy trashing this planet to spare the resources to go to another, then they'd wisely decide to avoid us for the sake of their own sanity.
On a more serious level, the main problems with interstellar travel are rather obvious: the distances are enormous, the resources required are almost unimaginable, the expense would be prohibitive to say the least, and the time involved would be far beyond anyone's lifetime.
I have a tattered paperback book with a lot of loose pages, kept together by tying it closed with string when not in use, titled Beyond The Moon, by the Italian astronomer Paolo Maffei, in which he takes us on an imaginary space flight from here beyond the moon to the outer limits of the observable universe. It's a fascinating 377 pages and a wonderful read, if you can find a copy, which isn't likely, because this is from 1980. A lot of it is still very relevant however, because the universe is still much like it was back then, even if we're not. In the preceding paragraph I mentioned the time involved in traveling through space. Here's what Paolo Maffei says about traveling from here to the nearest other star system, Alpha Centauri - "Traveling with the average speed of the spacecraft that now (1970s) go to the moon and back, the voyage would take 500,000 years."
How could we make something which could last that long and still keep operating normally, and who or what would operate it, and how would anyone know if it ever arrived safely? Life on this planet might be extinct long before it arrived at its destination, if it ever did. This is just one of many reasons why most intelligent life in the galaxy might wisely decide to stay home and hope others do the same.
The world's eggheads have picked it up and ran with it, and made what I have to believe were tongue-in-cheek formulae for 'solving' the problem, even though there's no possible way to verify half the unknowns in their calculations. Maybe this is how the brains of the world amuse themselves, who knows?
But I like impossible problems and unanswerable questions, so sit back and give me a whack at this one. We haven't seen verifiable evidence of aliens from outer space, or E.T.s, or however you'd care to describe them - and for very good reasons. If they're capable of interstellar travel, then they're also smart enough to have already detected our radio and television broadcasts flying outwards into space and in effect forming a large 'bubble' around us. Even though those signals get weaker with increased distance, they would act as an 'early warning' for any approaching alien spacecraft. Once they tuned in and cleared up the signals, and discovered that we've got a collective intelligence not much above an unwashed turnip, and that we'd rather fight than eat, and that we're too busy trashing this planet to spare the resources to go to another, then they'd wisely decide to avoid us for the sake of their own sanity.
On a more serious level, the main problems with interstellar travel are rather obvious: the distances are enormous, the resources required are almost unimaginable, the expense would be prohibitive to say the least, and the time involved would be far beyond anyone's lifetime.
I have a tattered paperback book with a lot of loose pages, kept together by tying it closed with string when not in use, titled Beyond The Moon, by the Italian astronomer Paolo Maffei, in which he takes us on an imaginary space flight from here beyond the moon to the outer limits of the observable universe. It's a fascinating 377 pages and a wonderful read, if you can find a copy, which isn't likely, because this is from 1980. A lot of it is still very relevant however, because the universe is still much like it was back then, even if we're not. In the preceding paragraph I mentioned the time involved in traveling through space. Here's what Paolo Maffei says about traveling from here to the nearest other star system, Alpha Centauri - "Traveling with the average speed of the spacecraft that now (1970s) go to the moon and back, the voyage would take 500,000 years."
How could we make something which could last that long and still keep operating normally, and who or what would operate it, and how would anyone know if it ever arrived safely? Life on this planet might be extinct long before it arrived at its destination, if it ever did. This is just one of many reasons why most intelligent life in the galaxy might wisely decide to stay home and hope others do the same.
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Saturday, December 8, 2012
'Oldest Living Blogger' says: "I'm too old for Quantum Mechanics!"
The Internet is a marvelous place to visit, isn't it? I was reading something about the Mars rover Opportunity still in action on Mars, and how it has found all sorts of tiny little spherules in the rocks there....
and these are quite small, the biggest ones being only about 3 mm in diameter, but there are different kinds, and at many different locations where Opportunity has been.
That got me reviewing what I've learned so far about Mars, and then checking other related topics on the Internet, and somehow or other, I ended up reading about Quantum Mechanics, or more specifically an introduction to the basics of Quantum Mechanics for Dummies. And there's a high probability I won't live long enough to get a grasp of Max Planck's constant and quantizing of energy, and why in an atom only certain energy levels are allowed while others are forbidden, and I'm having a lot of trouble trying to picture something being both a wave and a particle simultaneously.
That latter because a wave implies something made up of more than one, while a particle suggests a single item on its own whizzing around its proton or nucleus or whatever. I found the old classical definition of an atom as depicted in a planetary situation more logical than this modern system describing a "95% probability of it being in this region here..." and the author of the article was right in saying that we would find ourselves having trouble getting our heads around some of these ideas. I agree with 'Uncle Albert' when he said "I can't believe God plays dice with the universe."
But I can understand that there would need to be different rules for microcosmic objects which of necessity operate on a different time frame and at different speeds than those of the macrocosmic world with which we're more familiar. Electrons orbiting their nucleus are obviously going to be traveling at a different rate than for example a planet like Earth travels around its nucleus, the sun. And if the Earth is moving through space in 8 directions simultaneously, then it's no wonder we need some conversion factors to explain the motions of those atomic and subatomic particles/waves making up this whole unidentified flying object here. And today's Question Everything is this:
Do those electrons and other subatomic particles have their own versions of the moons/satellites flying around our planets, and is that why their behavior fits both the wave and particle model?
and these are quite small, the biggest ones being only about 3 mm in diameter, but there are different kinds, and at many different locations where Opportunity has been.
That got me reviewing what I've learned so far about Mars, and then checking other related topics on the Internet, and somehow or other, I ended up reading about Quantum Mechanics, or more specifically an introduction to the basics of Quantum Mechanics for Dummies. And there's a high probability I won't live long enough to get a grasp of Max Planck's constant and quantizing of energy, and why in an atom only certain energy levels are allowed while others are forbidden, and I'm having a lot of trouble trying to picture something being both a wave and a particle simultaneously.
That latter because a wave implies something made up of more than one, while a particle suggests a single item on its own whizzing around its proton or nucleus or whatever. I found the old classical definition of an atom as depicted in a planetary situation more logical than this modern system describing a "95% probability of it being in this region here..." and the author of the article was right in saying that we would find ourselves having trouble getting our heads around some of these ideas. I agree with 'Uncle Albert' when he said "I can't believe God plays dice with the universe."
But I can understand that there would need to be different rules for microcosmic objects which of necessity operate on a different time frame and at different speeds than those of the macrocosmic world with which we're more familiar. Electrons orbiting their nucleus are obviously going to be traveling at a different rate than for example a planet like Earth travels around its nucleus, the sun. And if the Earth is moving through space in 8 directions simultaneously, then it's no wonder we need some conversion factors to explain the motions of those atomic and subatomic particles/waves making up this whole unidentified flying object here. And today's Question Everything is this:
Do those electrons and other subatomic particles have their own versions of the moons/satellites flying around our planets, and is that why their behavior fits both the wave and particle model?
Friday, December 7, 2012
Thursday, December 6, 2012
The Big Bang and Black Holes....
Question Everything:-
Is there a relationship between our Big Bang and Black Holes? Specifically, super-massive black holes, and the primordial superheated 'soup' from which our universe eventually coagulated. Approximately 75% of our universe is hydrogen, and the other 25% is Helium, and the other elements we're familiar with make up less than 1% of the total.
Our familiar atoms are made of subatomic particles, such as electrons, muons, quarks, and leptons, and of those, we haven't yet found any subdivisions of either electrons or muons. So could those survive ingestion by a super-massive black hole and ejection from its other end, to form the plasma we postulate as the initiation of our universe? In other words, is this a natural cycle of events? Does matter eventually get swallowed by black holes, to re-appear elsewhere as fundamental subatomic particles in a superheated state corresponding to conditions similar to those of the Big Bang? Is it a recurring cycle?
Sometimes, I wish I could sit down with some of the brains of the world and just ask stupid questions like these, and see what they might say.
Is there a relationship between our Big Bang and Black Holes? Specifically, super-massive black holes, and the primordial superheated 'soup' from which our universe eventually coagulated. Approximately 75% of our universe is hydrogen, and the other 25% is Helium, and the other elements we're familiar with make up less than 1% of the total.
Our familiar atoms are made of subatomic particles, such as electrons, muons, quarks, and leptons, and of those, we haven't yet found any subdivisions of either electrons or muons. So could those survive ingestion by a super-massive black hole and ejection from its other end, to form the plasma we postulate as the initiation of our universe? In other words, is this a natural cycle of events? Does matter eventually get swallowed by black holes, to re-appear elsewhere as fundamental subatomic particles in a superheated state corresponding to conditions similar to those of the Big Bang? Is it a recurring cycle?
Sometimes, I wish I could sit down with some of the brains of the world and just ask stupid questions like these, and see what they might say.
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Meanwhile, on Mars...
The rover Curiosity is busy chomping on sand and spitting out reports on its contents and lack thereof. There's chlorinated compounds, and an unusual ratio of deuterium to hydrogen in water samples.
Deuterium, it turns out, is a significant indicator of the initial formation of the universe during the period immediately after the Big Bang, and the ratio of deuterium to hydrogen (protium) hasn't changed much since that Big Bang. There's an interesting statement in Wikipedia's page on Deuterium, which reads as follows:-
"In fact, the discovery of deuterium/protium ratios in a number of comets very similar to the mean ratio in Earth's oceans (156 atoms of deuterium per million hydrogens) has led to theories that much of the Earth's ocean water has a cometary origin.
Deuterium/protium ratios thus continue to be an active topic of research in both astronomy and climatology."
Now then - let's turn that around and look at it this way:- It would be more logical to assume that a planet's oceans had become comets following some cataclysmic event such as the collision of that planet with another similar body from space, rather than to assume that somehow, magically, a bunch of comets were attracted to a planet where these dirty snowballs then melted to form its oceans.
Older texts report that Mars about three and a half billion years ago was struck by a meteoroid of between 100 and 200 Kms in diameter which punctured its crust causing a major tectonic event. That 'major tectonic event' probably involved an interior explosion inside the core of Mars which would then cause immediate if momentary expansion of the planet's core. That in turn might have thrown off its skin of hard surfaces, or most of those, including its oceans. This debris then very probably drifted off in space, forming what's now called the Asteroid Belt and our periodic Comets, samples from which have indicated sodium content, suggestive of salt water origins.
I think my theory makes more sense than some kind of reversed process involving mysterious comets forming oceans on planets in some unexplained manner.
But getting back to Mars - today's Question Everything is: How can they tell whether the elements found on Mars are those which are native to its own origins, or whether those have arrived later, such as via that meteoroid which collided with it long ago?
Deuterium, it turns out, is a significant indicator of the initial formation of the universe during the period immediately after the Big Bang, and the ratio of deuterium to hydrogen (protium) hasn't changed much since that Big Bang. There's an interesting statement in Wikipedia's page on Deuterium, which reads as follows:-
"In fact, the discovery of deuterium/protium ratios in a number of comets very similar to the mean ratio in Earth's oceans (156 atoms of deuterium per million hydrogens) has led to theories that much of the Earth's ocean water has a cometary origin.
Deuterium/protium ratios thus continue to be an active topic of research in both astronomy and climatology."
Now then - let's turn that around and look at it this way:- It would be more logical to assume that a planet's oceans had become comets following some cataclysmic event such as the collision of that planet with another similar body from space, rather than to assume that somehow, magically, a bunch of comets were attracted to a planet where these dirty snowballs then melted to form its oceans.
Older texts report that Mars about three and a half billion years ago was struck by a meteoroid of between 100 and 200 Kms in diameter which punctured its crust causing a major tectonic event. That 'major tectonic event' probably involved an interior explosion inside the core of Mars which would then cause immediate if momentary expansion of the planet's core. That in turn might have thrown off its skin of hard surfaces, or most of those, including its oceans. This debris then very probably drifted off in space, forming what's now called the Asteroid Belt and our periodic Comets, samples from which have indicated sodium content, suggestive of salt water origins.
I think my theory makes more sense than some kind of reversed process involving mysterious comets forming oceans on planets in some unexplained manner.
But getting back to Mars - today's Question Everything is: How can they tell whether the elements found on Mars are those which are native to its own origins, or whether those have arrived later, such as via that meteoroid which collided with it long ago?
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Monday, December 3, 2012
The Cheese Doughnut
Melt a slice of cheese singles over a glazed doughnut for 25 seconds in a 1200-watt microwave, and voila! C'est magnifique....
Not a 'golden oldie' by any means...
Just to show that my musical tastes aren't all in the Stone Age, here's another of my favorite performers, Sarah Brightman. This lady has a voice like an angel.
Another Moldy Oldie...or two...or three
Der Bingle, as Al Jolson once referred to him, cut this original with the Dorsey band back in 1936 for a movie called 'Rhythm On The Range' featuring a mess of drugstore cowboys pretending they knew which end of a horse points toward the front. He cut other versions of this over the years, but this one must have been a favorite, because it was included in a 1977 'two-fer' (double) album on MCA titled 'The Best of Bing Crosby'. The year Bing cut this record, I was four years old. Ain't technology grand?
Speaking of Al Jolson, here's one of his that I think is very typical of his style, titled 'California Here I Come', which captures Jolson during his best years.
And here's the original of a great cut by Bing and Louis that was re-released in 1977 on Capitol/EMI's LP Bing Crosby - Louis Armstrong called simply 'Sugar'....
More 'Oldest Living Blogger' - Sleeping in The Big Chair
I did it again. Fell asleep in the big chair at the table, watching TV after supper. Now, I'm awake, my back hurts, it's 1:48 A.M., there's nothing worth watching on my 72 channels of satellite TV, the coffee's hot, and I'm not especially sleepy after my nap.... So the question is, "What do I do now?"
It's a question I've arrived at under very similar circumstances all too often lately. And it's my own fault, of course. A few months ago, I wandered into the big office supply store about four blocks down the street from here, into its furniture section at the back, where a nice young man and I got into a long conversation about office chairs, and which is better, the traditional types, or the kneeling style ones. I tried them all, and bought a kneeler for $145. It works very well, and does improve your posture and keep your lower back in a better position - but as the name implies, it does affect the knees. So I went back to the same young man at the office supply, for something else.
He asked, "Was there something wrong with the kneeler?" And I replied, "No, the something wrong is with my knee - the one I wrecked showing off on Blackcomb one day about 25 years ago. I thought it had healed years ago, but that kneeler got it all upset again - so let's try something else, shall we?" He said, "Would you like to return the kneeler?" And I said, "No way! I really like that crazy thing, and it's great for when you want a change from the usual, but now let's look at 'usual' - make me a deal I can't refuse..." So he did. And I've got this big deluxe office chair, leather, adjustable five ways from Sunday, very comfortable - did I mention you can sleep in it?
The Italian aerator on my kitchen tap set finally wore out last week, and I went looking for its newest incarnation at the big building supplies supermarket near the waterfront yesterday. Sunday is a good day for that, because all those self-employed contractors who usually haunt the place on weekdays are all at home sleeping in, or out golfing or skiing or fishing, and you've got a nice relaxed atmosphere in which to browse to your heart's content. Anyway, there I am admiring a rack with almost every imaginable kind of fixture there is for sinks and tap sets, and I found the thing I wanted, plus a couple of its other family members. There's now a deluxe model with a little more chrome and a double swivel action between the spout pipe and the wet end of it, and it's got a fat middle section, like one of my old girlfriends, for easier handling. Costs $15.58 + tax. I only bought one. That and one 150-watt CFL (uses 40 watts) light bulb for the desk lamp came to $35.69 with the tax. I must be getting stronger in my old age - years ago, I couldn't hardly lift whatever you got for $36 at the lumberyard, which is really what this elegant place really is. It's a lumberyard with a hardware section that got out of hand, and now includes $3,500 hot tubs, and $4,000 barbeques along with the floor tiles and nuts & bolts and glue and paint and gardening supplies. It's a man-trap is what it is - you get in there, and if you're lucky, you escape in time for lunch. So in retrospect paying them $35.69 to turn me loose and let me go home wasn't so bad after all.....
It's a question I've arrived at under very similar circumstances all too often lately. And it's my own fault, of course. A few months ago, I wandered into the big office supply store about four blocks down the street from here, into its furniture section at the back, where a nice young man and I got into a long conversation about office chairs, and which is better, the traditional types, or the kneeling style ones. I tried them all, and bought a kneeler for $145. It works very well, and does improve your posture and keep your lower back in a better position - but as the name implies, it does affect the knees. So I went back to the same young man at the office supply, for something else.
He asked, "Was there something wrong with the kneeler?" And I replied, "No, the something wrong is with my knee - the one I wrecked showing off on Blackcomb one day about 25 years ago. I thought it had healed years ago, but that kneeler got it all upset again - so let's try something else, shall we?" He said, "Would you like to return the kneeler?" And I said, "No way! I really like that crazy thing, and it's great for when you want a change from the usual, but now let's look at 'usual' - make me a deal I can't refuse..." So he did. And I've got this big deluxe office chair, leather, adjustable five ways from Sunday, very comfortable - did I mention you can sleep in it?
The Italian aerator on my kitchen tap set finally wore out last week, and I went looking for its newest incarnation at the big building supplies supermarket near the waterfront yesterday. Sunday is a good day for that, because all those self-employed contractors who usually haunt the place on weekdays are all at home sleeping in, or out golfing or skiing or fishing, and you've got a nice relaxed atmosphere in which to browse to your heart's content. Anyway, there I am admiring a rack with almost every imaginable kind of fixture there is for sinks and tap sets, and I found the thing I wanted, plus a couple of its other family members. There's now a deluxe model with a little more chrome and a double swivel action between the spout pipe and the wet end of it, and it's got a fat middle section, like one of my old girlfriends, for easier handling. Costs $15.58 + tax. I only bought one. That and one 150-watt CFL (uses 40 watts) light bulb for the desk lamp came to $35.69 with the tax. I must be getting stronger in my old age - years ago, I couldn't hardly lift whatever you got for $36 at the lumberyard, which is really what this elegant place really is. It's a lumberyard with a hardware section that got out of hand, and now includes $3,500 hot tubs, and $4,000 barbeques along with the floor tiles and nuts & bolts and glue and paint and gardening supplies. It's a man-trap is what it is - you get in there, and if you're lucky, you escape in time for lunch. So in retrospect paying them $35.69 to turn me loose and let me go home wasn't so bad after all.....
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Morning in the hills
About half an hour after I took this, it clouded over again, and it's been raining ever since. Our bright sunny morning was lovely while it lasted.
In the news.... man-made brain
Just when you think you've seen everything, along comes something like this and proves you haven't.
Today's 'Question Everything' is:- "How can we get this thing elected to Parliament in place of our P.M., the ever-radiant 'Hairspray' Harper?" (If 'Stodgy Stephen' had one more brain cell, it would be a miracle! - Would I lie to you?)
Today's 'Question Everything' is:- "How can we get this thing elected to Parliament in place of our P.M., the ever-radiant 'Hairspray' Harper?" (If 'Stodgy Stephen' had one more brain cell, it would be a miracle! - Would I lie to you?)
Remembering Disco.....
Boney M was very big back then, and because they were black, a lot of us made the mistake of thinking they were African-American, but they were really from Germany, and nobody did it better. We've all got a favorite Boney M album - those of us who were around back then, that is.... That beat was just irresistible. Go onto YouTube and give this a listen. And those costumes were 'something else', weren't they?
Saturday, December 1, 2012
Anyone remember Disco ?
There's some nice Christmas songs on here, though, and it moves right along....
Starting a new month with a cautionary tale...
Once upon a time, there was an old guy who liked to frequently add items to his blog, and at other times, he liked to review what was already on there, to see if anyone had left any new comments. This old guy was doing that reviewing again today, when he had an accident....
There was a cup of coffee sitting in front of him, too close to the edge of the desk, and as he reached beyond it to pick up a pen, his sleeve tipped over the cup. There was about half a cup of coffee in that cup, and it went flying all over him and the carpet. And the cautionary tale part of all this is that it took a couple of hours to do the laundry and use the Hoover SpinScrub on the carpet, to clean up all that mess. One thing leads to another, and time flies when you're having fun. The good news is, I've now got a clean shirt & pants, and the carpet looks much nicer too. Even though I hadn't planned any of that for this afternoon. I was about to go to the supermarket before that happened, and I'm still planning on getting there sometime today.
There was a cup of coffee sitting in front of him, too close to the edge of the desk, and as he reached beyond it to pick up a pen, his sleeve tipped over the cup. There was about half a cup of coffee in that cup, and it went flying all over him and the carpet. And the cautionary tale part of all this is that it took a couple of hours to do the laundry and use the Hoover SpinScrub on the carpet, to clean up all that mess. One thing leads to another, and time flies when you're having fun. The good news is, I've now got a clean shirt & pants, and the carpet looks much nicer too. Even though I hadn't planned any of that for this afternoon. I was about to go to the supermarket before that happened, and I'm still planning on getting there sometime today.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)